Illegal Cuff
  • Audits
  • Disturbing the Peace
  • Drunk Disorderly Conduct
  • News Reports
  • Roadblocks
  • Riots
  • Traffic Stops
No Result
View All Result
Illegal Cuff
  • Audits
  • Disturbing the Peace
  • Drunk Disorderly Conduct
  • News Reports
  • Roadblocks
  • Riots
  • Traffic Stops
No Result
View All Result
Illegal Cuff
No Result
View All Result

Three 1st Amendment Audits You Should Learn From | Id Refusal #23

PEO USA by PEO USA
October 21, 2024
0



Three 1st Amendment Audits You Should Learn From | Id Refusal #23
The video captures a tense situation between a citizen and police officers at a government agency during a 1st Amendment Audit. In the video, the citizen firmly defends their right to film in public, despite demands to stop and threats of arrest from the police. The citizen emphasizes that filming is part of the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment, citing the legal case Smith v. Cummings to bolster their argument.

The video also highlights the police’s disrespect for citizens’ rights, particularly when they demand that the citizen produce identification without reasonable cause, showcasing a clear id refusal scenario. This situation takes place in a public agency where citizens have the right to film public officials while they carry out their duties, reinforcing the concept of id refusal during interactions with law enforcement. Ultimately, the video encourages viewers to document and file official complaints when citizens’ rights are violated, stressing the importance of protecting civil rights and raising legal awareness within the community, particularly regarding 1st Amendment rights.

Copyright Disclaimer: – This video may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review, and news reporting, which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review, and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
Note: My sincere request to all copyright owners: If you believe your original content is in my video, please contact me before making any decisions. Together, we can reach the best resolution that benefits both parties from all perspectives.
#idrefusal
#1stamendmentaudit
#dismissed
#police
#cops
#copdismissed
#walkofshame
#1aaudits
#copsgettingowned
#copsowned
#firstamendmentaudits
#peousa

Tags: 1st1st amendment audit1st amendment audit failAmendmentAuditAuditingauditing americaauditsbody cambodycamcopscops ownedcrimedash-camdashcamfirst amendmentfirst amendment auditFirst Amendment rightsid refusalLawlearnpeo usapolicepolice activitypolice bodycamPolice misconductRefusalTVIP CAMwalk of shame
Previous Post

NWSSC – Roadblock – Traffic diverted

Next Post

We need to have a public conversation “in which we establish a collective moral framework”

Next Post

We need to have a public conversation "in which we establish a collective moral framework"

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

No Result
View All Result
  • Audits
  • Disturbing the Peace
  • Drunk Disorderly Conduct
  • News Reports
  • Roadblocks
  • Riots
  • Traffic Stops

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Illegal Cuff