The episode of The John Ligato Show delves into the ongoing issue of aggressive frauditors who provoke and harass public officials and law enforcement officers. John Ligato examines the behavior of these individuals, exposing their tactics and highlighting the challenges faced by police in dealing with them.
Key Points from the Episode:
Frauditors’ Tactics and Goals:
Frauditors, like Glenn Serio and others, deliberately provoke law enforcement officers and public employees, hoping to create viral content and trigger lawsuits. They use aggressive language, issue demands, and often escalate situations for clicks and views.
John Ligato points out that their actions are not about protecting free speech or constitutional rights but are designed to cause chaos and earn money through monetized videos and settlements.
Manipulating Public Spaces:
Frauditors frequently claim that public buildings are completely unrestricted, even when areas are designated for specific purposes. Ligato explains that government entities have the right to establish time, place, and manner restrictions, just as private properties do.
The episode showcases frauditors filming sensitive areas, like public records containing personal information, and refusing to comply with requests to leave, claiming that any attempt to stop them is a violation of their rights.
Unprovoked Verbal Attacks:
The show highlights instances where frauditors launch unprovoked, vicious verbal assaults on public officials, including law enforcement. Phrases like “Next time you do that, I’ll take you to the ground, okay?” are designed to intimidate and bait officers into reacting.
Ligato emphasizes the mental toll on officers who must remain calm and professional, even when frauditors are hurling insults and making veiled threats.
Dealing with Sovereign Citizens and Canadian Frauditors:
The episode also touches on the behavior of sovereign citizens, who refuse to acknowledge the government’s authority, and Canadian frauditors who mimic American tactics, despite Canada not having a First Amendment.
These interactions often lead to accusations of assault when security or police officers enforce rules, as seen with a frauditor being ejected from a Toronto courthouse. The frauditor’s response is to hurl insults and claim rights that do not exist under Canadian law.
Potential Legal Violations:
Ligato outlines several violations that law enforcement can use against frauditors, including obstruction, interference, trespassing, and “fighting words” (language intended to incite violence).
He explains that while the Supreme Court permits offensive speech, frauditors frequently cross the line into criminal behavior. For example, refusing to leave a restricted area after being asked is considered trespassing, and threatening language can qualify as fighting words.
Legal Precedents and the Chaplinsky Case:
The episode references the Chaplinsky case, which allows certain types of offensive language in public. However, frauditors often misuse this precedent to justify behavior that goes beyond free speech and into criminal activity.
Ligato argues that law enforcement needs to be proactive in using existing laws to hold frauditors accountable for their actions.
Final Thoughts:
John Ligato expresses frustration with the current state of affairs, where frauditors get away with abusive behavior under the guise of protecting constitutional rights. He calls for better enforcement of laws like trespassing and interference and suggests that officers need support and training to handle these confrontations effectively.
► Visit my blog for the latest article about this video:
► Join this channel to get access to perks:
#civilliberties #firstamendmentaduits #firstamendmentauditor #freedomofspeech #lawenforcement #compliance #auditors #frauditor #frauditors #4thamendment #legalunderstanding
