Cover-up exposed in Nashua New Hampshire. Hollis Police New Hampshire trying to silence a Whistle Blower with additional complaints, unfortunately for them that person was me, and I am Draining Their Swamp. Denying a Man a Trial over a case that is most likely a False Arrest; is a Crime Against Constitutional Law, how many others have fell silent in New Hampshire to these same cruel and unconstitutional tactics?
Alleged Crime? 2 Counts of Call Harassment, with a Purpose to Annoy.
Alleged Victims? The Hollis Police and the Hollis Town Hall New Hampshire.
Hollis NH and the Clerks at the Nashua Court had tried jamming me through to be declared incompetent, with the seemingly incompetent Judge Moore , and tried denying me a Trial by way of excluding me from the Legal Process and set me up with the Corrupt Chief Forensic Examiner Shannon Bader who I can only assume was the women sneaking away all slack jawed as I mentioned the Chief Forensic Examiner and was about to expose her blatant untruths.
I had already beat the Competency Evaluation by Motion, so Hollis and the Corrupt Clerks (involved in my initial complaints) just passed them off to seemingly Corrupt Judge Moore behind my back with no notice to me and signed them in one day instead of the 10 demanded by Law, and with no Proper Notice to me.
After moving the Class A’s down to Class B’s blocking my Rule 21:A:1 Immediate Trial de Novo Appeal (a speedy Jury Trial in the context of misdemeanors) Hollis put the Following Case Law forward and raised the Charges back up to Class A’s after I caught them Red Handed breaking the Wire Tapping Statues.
This test requires that a defendant have: “(1) a sufficient present ability to consult with and assist a lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding; and (2) a factual as well as rational understanding of the proceedings against him.” Moncada, 161 NH and 974.
This is alleged to be done within the direct context of me having a Fair Trial, which I hope we can all see is well beyond a gross intentional violation of those Constitutional Edicts.
Why I say Hollis Broke the Wire Tapping Statues is because they Recorded me on an unrecorded line with notice to me, but particularly with no Memorandum from the Attorney’s Generals Office or any Documentation from the County Attorney’s Office by Hollis’s own admission, which the Wire Tapping Statue specifies as needed for Call Harassment. Hollis had no need to default on the Wire Tapping Statues for Call Harassment because they are built for a fluid situation by no Judges Signature needed and by the Documentation can be produce days later. But Hollis has already de facto admitted to their lack of documentation required to Wire Tap a Line in New Hampshire.
Stay Tuned for More…
{Follow} and also {Follow} @RealRandyRoss on Facebook, Twitter, and Minds
www.ParadoxChronicle.com
